http://district50ablog.blogspot.com/
Thanks G-man for another great contribution:
Wal-Mart vs. The Morons |
41B represents Freedom in Columbia Heights,Hilltop,and southern New Brighton and St.Anthony. The links on this blog represent views that may not be the same as HD41B and are included for the entertainment and education of its readers. If you have a comment leave it in any comment link the moderator will get it.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
SmartZone Communications Center: Fw: [BuckhornClub] Fwd: Wal-Mart vs. The Morons
Saturday, January 1, 2011
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Thanks G-man for another elucidating contribution.
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this. It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message,NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION,was removed.
An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Our Social Security
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary
2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65%
on the first $90,000
3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible
4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,
Under Johnson the money was moved to
The General Fund and Spent
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Under Clinton & Gore
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month --
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away' -- you may be interested in the following:
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?
AND MY FAVORITE:
A: That's right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!
------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will
evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully
sure of what isn't so.
But it's worth a try. How many people will YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Timothy Utz appointed to the C. H. Charter Commission.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Here We Go Again...
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Thanks Tim for sharing.
Folks,
I could not state better than Emma, My 9 year old granddaughter on the value, purpose and meaning of Christmas. In a society bent on “holiday greetings” over “Christmas” season her insight at 9 gives hope to our great country that the future generations may restore our Republic if we hold onto our history and purpose in life.
Tim Utz
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:38 PM Subject: Here we go again
Christmas is a lot of fun,but we can't forget what Christmas is really about.It's fun getting presents,spending time with family,caroling,sledding,getting Christmas cards,decorating,and even wearing a smile!But,we should ware a smile about Jesus and his birth.Many people don't know Jesus so,e-mail this to any body family,friends, or even people you just got to know.
Here we go again!! YAY!!! It's Christmas!! Jesus is born!!Ya know lets not buy anything this year or the next,or the next!!
Now do we here that at all? Well I never heard it in my life! Have you?Ya know as I said before a lot of people don't know Jesus,how he loves you,how he died for you,how he teaches us in ways we don't know,and how he waits for you up in heaven.I you want to know how you can go to heaven,and learn about Jesus,look for a church,and talk to the pastor. We need a lot of people to understand that Jesus is waiting for them in heaven. Have a great Christmas and a happy New Year!
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Tim Utz Appointment
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
From SAF
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
from League of American Voters
district50ablog.blogspot.com
TO OBAMA: WIMPS DON’T WIN
By Dick Morris
Moving to the center is not a two-dimensional process. It has a third dimension — the difference between strength and weakness. In the course of coming in from the cold of his extreme far-left positions, the president looks like a wimp, abandoning his long-held views in the face of electoral defeats, adverse court rulings, recalcitrant Democrats and strong, united Republican opposition.
And wimps don’t win.
|
When Bill Clinton moved to the center, he arrived in triumph. After vanquishing the Republican Congress during the government shutdown of 1995-96, he agreed to a balanced-budget deal with Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott. But it was his deal, along his lines, on his principles. When he signed a welfare reform bill, he did so after beating back and vetoing two Republican bills that coupled reform with harsh cuts to Medicaid. After he got a bill on his own terms, he signed it.
Barack Obama’s “compromise” with the Republicans over the Bush tax cuts is no more of a compromise than was the deal Emperor Hirohito cut with Gen. Douglas MacArthur on the deck of the battleship Missouri after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was a surrender, not a compromise. It was submission, not triangulation.
Obama is checkmated as long as Republicans hold firm, challenge him on solid grounds anchored in public opinion and remain united. He can either lose the election of 2012 because he is an obstinate ideologue who won’t compromise and won’t abandon his socialist principles or he can lose it because he does surrender and is too weak to be president.
He does not have a third option — winning the budget fights and winning reelection — as long as the Republicans properly mount their challenge, because public opinion, the essential element for victory, is not with him.
- Americans want spending cuts, not tax increases
- Americans believe that cutting spending is more important even than cutting the deficit (see Rasmussen)
- Americans oppose ObamaCare
- Americans are against letting the Environmental Protection Agency impose carbon dioxide restrictions without consulting Congress.
- Americans are against unilateral National Labor Relations Board action to eliminate the secret ballot in union elections.
- Americans oppose earmarks
- Americans do not want the Federal Communications Commission to limit or censor talk radio.
These are the grounds for our battles in 2011-2012. It is on this turf that the Republican House majority must fight. The fearful “moderate” Democratic senators will cave in. And then Obama will be forced to surrender because the Force — public opinion — is not with him. You can govern by ignoring what Americans think if you have a majority. But not if you don’t.
And with each surrender — over his desire to raise the debt limit without mandated spending cuts, over his support for bailing out states in trouble, and over his demand to raise taxes in the 2012 budget — Obama will get weaker and weaker.
His inability to fight and win the war on terror and his choice to become mired in Afghanistan with no real plan for winning will contribute to the image of weakness.
In 2012, he will face America denuded of all the programs he passed in 2009-2010, with an economy only slightly improved but with at least 7-8 percent unemployment, and with a manifest inability to measure up to the job of president.
Most presidents face a challenge of weakness. With Eisenhower, it was his refusal to stand up to Joe McCarthy. With Kennedy, it was his inability to pass legislation. With Nixon, it was his inability to get ahead of the Watergate scandal. With Ford, it was his helplessness in the face of inflation. With Carter, it was the hostage crisis. With Reagan, it was his failure to control the Iran-Contra affair. With Bush-41, it was his passivity on the economy. With Clinton, it was the flip-flopping early in h is presidency. With Obama, it will be his retreat in the face of the Republican counterattack of 2011.
Sponsor's Note:
district50ablog.blogspot.comMonday, December 20, 2010
From GOPUSA re FCC Take over of Internet
From GO
Friday, December 17, 2010
From the Minnesota Majority re Dream Act
- Senator Amy Klobuchar (202) 224-3244
- Senator Al Franken (202) 224-5641
- "Vote NO on Cloture for the DREAM Act. Please vote NO tomorrow on the DREAM Act."
- "Please ask Senator _______ to vote NO ON CLOTURE ON THE DREAM AMNESTY BILL and tell Harry Reid that America wants Congress to come home for Christmas and end the lame duck!"
- "Please ask Senator _____ to vote NO ON DREAM AMNESTY CLOTURE because HR5281 on page 5 line 21 allows Obama and Homeland Security to waive all requirements and grant amnesty to almost all illegal aliens in America."
- "Please vote NO ON CLOTURE FOR 5281 AMNESTY BILL because this bill will displace and replace millions of innocent American workers, students, and voters."
Thursday, December 16, 2010
MN Supreme Court to Rule on DNA Use!
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Conlon Death
Conlon Irish Wake
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Reason To Vote
Donna Schmitt for City Council
Tuesday, November 2, we have a right and duty to exercise our right to vote. It is important that we educate ourselves with how our candidates stand. But even beyond that, we need to realize that we are responsible for our representatives and their actions. If they make good decisions we need to praise them, if they make poor decisions, we need to hold them accountable. We cannot elect our representatives and think they can read our minds and that they will represent us in every decision. We need to keep them accountable at all times. If they ignore us, we need to ignore them at the poll by voting for their opponent.
The October 20th edition of the Northeaster has probably one of the best comprehensive voter’s guide for our area but unfortunately it is not available online. Dig it out of the recycle bin and check it out.
The polls are open from 7:00 a.m until 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday.
Donna Schmitt
To inspire you, here are some quotes from our forefathers:
“Now, more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature…
If the next centennial does not find us a great nation, it will be because those who represent the enterprise, the culture and the morality of the nation do not aid in controlling the political forces.”
James A. Garfield, 20th President of the United States
John Hancock, whose signature dominates the Declaration of Independence said…
“I urge you, by all that is dear, by all that is honorable, by all that is sacred, not only that ye pray but that ye act!”
Daniel Webster, the great Statesman of the early 19th century said…
“Our destruction if it come at all, will be from…the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence.”
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
–Ronald Reagan; 40th President of the United States
Donna Schmitt For City Council
Powered by ScribeFire.
TrainingManual.pdf (application/pdf Object)
Friday, October 29, 2010
'Vote Sloat' Rally
Kordiak Park Parking Lot
1845 49th Ave NE
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
It's time to show our enthusiasm for
Greg Sloat and Tim Utz
Gina Bauman has been invited
Come make a local presence, hear some good news, cheer and....
if you like, caravan to the Emmer Rally at the Anoka County Airport
to greet Governor Chris Christie from New Jersey!!
Powered by ScribeFire.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Council Work Session 10/18/2010 - Donna Schmitt For City Council
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Heads up re: Tax Payer Funded School, from Act For America
Katherine Kersten: TiZA vs. the search for truth
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/105067899.html?page=3&c=y
The battle over the role of Islam in a Minnesota public school is heating up again in a federal courtroom in St. Paul. The conflict began in January 2009, when the ACLU of Minnesota sued Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy -- a K-8 charter school with campuses in Inver Grove Heights and Blaine -- for violating constitutional prohibitions against government endorsement of religion.
TiZA since has fought tooth and nail -- erecting procedural barriers to prevent the ACLU from investigating what goes on behind its doors. The school's tactics have gone far beyond the usual rough-and-tumble of lawyers in our adversary system. Its chief tool has been attempted intimidation of all who would draw back the curtain on its secrets.
One of TiZA's first targets was the ACLU itself. A few months after the suit began, the school filed a $100,000-plus defamation claim, citing ACLU executive director Chuck Samuelson's simple statement that "[TiZA is] a theocratic school ... as plain as the substantial nose on my face." The court dismissed the claim.
In January 2010, the ACLU was back in court to seek a protective order, on grounds that intimidation by TiZA was discouraging potential witnesses from appearing. The ACLU filed affidavits by a former TiZA parent and a former TiZA staff member, who described what they interpreted as threats of violence against them. In her affidavit, the female staff member said that Asad Zaman -- TiZA's executive director -- had suggested after she displeased him: "We could just kill you, yeah tell your husband we'll do his job for him." (Zaman has no recollection of making such a statement, he said in an affidavit.) The court barred witness harassment or intimidation by either party.
In June 2010, the ACLU returned to court to quash what it described as yet another TiZA attempt to intimidate current and former employees from speaking about what they had seen at the public school. TiZA's "Staff Handbooks include a secrecy clause, and related threat of legal action for violating it," according to the ACLU's court filings. TiZA "wields [these provisions] as a sledgehammer to keep former employees quiet about what they saw at the school." As a result, "former TiZA employees have expressed fear about speaking to the ACLU."
According to the ACLU, TiZA's refusal to agree not to enforce the secrecy clause "sends the ominous signal that current and former employees who talk to the ACLU may be forced to defend themselves against a baseless, expensive lawsuit."
On Oct. 1, Judge Donovan Frank agreed -- affirming an order the ACLU had earlier won barring TiZA from enforcing the confidentiality clause in the context of this litigation.
The court's order and memorandum spoke volumes: "It appears that information related to TiZA's business, finances, operations and office procedures is public data and cannot be kept secret." "The relevant question ... is why TiZA, a public charter school, does not want to allow its former and current employees to participate in the informal discovery process to ascertain the truth about how TiZA operates."
The court's strong language in response to TiZA's actions was unusual: "[I]ntimidation and threats will not sit well with a fact-finder such as a jury." As a result of the school's actions, "[T]he Court may be required to draw adverse inferences about how TiZA operates as a result of TiZA's efforts to keep information about its operations secret. ... [TiZA's] behavior during the discovery process thus far ... has not been consistent with a good faith search for the truth."
The ACLU has characterized TiZA's recent actions regarding the secrecy clause as "only the last in a long line of intimidation efforts." Not quite. Last month, an attack was launched from a different front.
Several organizations that are not even parties to the lawsuit went to court in an attempt to disqualify the ACLU's lawyers -- Dorsey & Whitney -- from representing the ACLU on grounds that Dorsey personnel had previously communicated with Zaman about entities involved in the litigation. The organizations include the Muslim American Society of Minnesota (MAS-MN), MAS-MN Property Holding Corporation and the Minnesota Education Trust (MET).
What might they fear? Perhaps that Dorsey lawyers are in a position to prove that the scandal thus far -- and Zaman's role in it -- is just the tip of the iceberg. Dorsey lawyers had this to say in a Sept. 10 letter filed with the court:
"The ACLU believes Mr. Zaman's testimony relating to control of virtually every significant event at TiZA, MAS-MN, MET and MET's subsidiaries, coupled with his efforts to hide such control, constitute powerful evidence against TiZA's denials that it is a Muslim school and that it funnels state and federal money to other Muslim organizations."
Every time we read about this lawsuit, we have to pinch ourselves and say: We're talking about a public, taxpayer-funded school.
Katherine Kersten is a Twin Cities writer and speaker.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Gina Bauman will be holding Townhall Meetings- come on down and meet her
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Gina will be holding two Town Hall style meetings
this week on Thursday evening 10/21 and Saturday morning
10/23.
Brighton Family Service Center, 400 10th Street NW, Room 424 at 6:30
PM.
County Fridley Branch located at 410 Mississippi St NE and will begin at 10:30
AM.
both of these informal question and answer sessions where Gina will address your
questions and concerns.
From the heart of a Muslim - Tawfik Hamid
Thanks for Sharing Gman and Thanks to Dr. Hamid for saying what needs to be said as a first step toward changing Islam. Now lets see what happens!
date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 10:20 AM
"For evil to flourish, all that is needed is for good people to do nothing."
Edmund Burke
|
I was born a Muslim and lived all my life as a follower of Islam.
After the barbaric terrorist attacks done by the hands of my fellow Muslims everywhere on this globe, and after the too many violent acts by Islamists in many parts of the world, I feel responsible as a Muslim and as a human being, to speak out and tell the truth to protect the world and Muslims as well from a coming catastrophe and war of civilizations.
I have to admit that our current Islamic teaching creates violence and hatred toward Non-Muslims. We Muslims are the ones who need to change. Until now we have accepted polygamy, the beating of women by men, and killing those who convert from Islam to other religions.
We have never had a clear and strong stand against the concept of slavery or wars, to spread our religion and to subjugate others to Islam and force them to pay a humiliating tax called Jizia. We ask others to respect our religion while all the time we curse non-Muslims loudly (in Arabic) in our Friday prayers in the Mosques.
What message do we convey to our children when we call the Jews "Descendants of the pigs and monkeys".. Is this a message of love and peace, or a message of hate?
I have been into churches and synagogues where they were praying for Muslims. While all the time we curse them, and teach our generations to call them infidels, and to hate them.
We immediately jump in a 'knee jerk reflex' to defend Prophet Mohammad when someone accuses him of being a pedophile while, at the same time, we are proud with the story in our Islamic books, that he married a young girl seven years old (Aisha) when he was above 50 years old.
I am sad to say that many, if not most of us, rejoiced in happiness after September 11th and after many other terror attacks.
Muslims denounce these attacks to look good in front of the media, but we condone the Islamic terrorists and sympathise with their cause. Till now our 'reputable' top religious authorities have never issued a Fatwa or religious statement to proclaim Bin Laden as an apostate, while an author, like Rushdie, was declared an apostate who should be killed according to Islamic Shariia law just for writing a book criticizing Islam.
Muslims demonstrated to get more religious rights as we did in France to stop the ban on the Hejab (Head Scarf), while we did not demonstrate with such passion and in such numbers against the terrorist murders.
It is our absolute silence against the terrorists that gives the energy to these terrorists to continue doing their evil acts. We Muslims need to stop blaming our problems on others or on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. As a matter of honesty, Israel is the only light of democracy, civilization, and human rights in the whole Middle East .
We kicked out the Jews with no compensation or mercy from most of the Arab countries to make them "Jews-Free countries" while Israel accepted more than a million Arabs to live there, have its nationality, and enjoy their rights as human beings. In Israel , women can not be beaten legally by men, and any person can change his/her belief system with no fear of being killed by the Islamic law of 'Apostasy,' while in our Islamic world people do not enjoy any of these rights. I agree that the 'Palestinians' suffer, but they suffer because of their corrupt leaders and not because of Israel .
It is not common to see Arabs who live in Israel leaving to live in the Arab world. On the other hand, we used to see thousands of Palestinians going to work with happiness in Israel , its 'enemy'. If Israel treats Arabs badly as some people claim, surely we would have seen the opposite happening.
We Muslims need to admit our problems and face them. Only then we can treat them and start a new era to live in harmony with human mankind. Our religious leaders have to show a clear and very strong stand against polygamy, pedophilia,slavery, killing those who convert from Islam to other religions, beating of women by men, and declaring wars on non-Muslims to spread Islam.
Then, and only then, do we have the right to ask others to respect our religion. The time has come to stop our hypocrisy and say it openly: 'We Muslims have to Change'.
Tawfik Hamid
Dr. Tawfik Hamid is an Islamic thinker and reformer, and one time Islamic extremist from Egypt. He was a member of a terrorist Islamic organization Jamaa Islamiya with Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri, who later became the second in command of Al-Qaeda. Some twenty-five years ago, Dr. Hamid recognized the threat of radical Islam and the need for a reformation based upon modern peaceful interpretations of classical Islamic core texts. Dr. Hamid provided a fresh and theologically valid interpretation for the Quran to counterbalance the radical teaching.
As the Daily Express (UK) mentioned, "Dr. Hamid has predicted the attacks on the twin towers, Madrid and London." After September 11, Dr. Hamid decided to speak out through western broadcast and print media. He has appeared on shows spanning the spectrum from CNN to Fox News, and his articles and Op-Ed pieces have appeared in publications such as the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, and the Jerusalem Post. Dr. Hamid's exceptional knowledge of the jihadi mindset has caused him to be invited as a guest speaker at private and governmental fora around the world. Dr. Hamid has a unique insight into the minds of radical terrorists and wants to share ways in which he can positively influence their way of thinking and end their violent actions.
Dr. Hamid, who is also known as Tarek Abdelhamid, has a medical degree in internal medicine and a Master's degree in cognitive psychology and educational techniques. Currently Dr. Hamid is a Senior Fellow at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies and President of the Global Movement Against Radical Islam. Dr. Hamid is also the author of Inside Jihad.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Tim Utz, Gina Bauman, Russ Bertsch in debate
"After watching the video of the event it doesn't appear that anything terribly exciting happened. All of the GOPers (Gina Bauman for SD50 Senate, Tim Utz for HD50A House, and Russ Bertsch for HD50B House) presented their Conservative case well in spite of the shallowness of the softball questions while the libs showed their true socialist leanings. Hopefully those who generally don’t follow politics will watch one of the many replays or the internet feed and conclude that all of the DFLers need to be denied election or re-election to office as they all showed they are clueless when it comes to what the people want or need."
To read more follow link below
Boots On: District 50 North Metro Mayors Forum - Dull, but revealing
Minnesotans for Personal Choice and Competition in Health Care Endorse Tim Utz
Press Release #60
10-5-10 Endorsement
From Minnesotans for Personal Choice and Competition in Health Care
Tim Utz for House received the endorsement of Minnesotans for Personal
Choice and Competition in Health Care. The group promotes Constitutional
responsible private solutions to providing Americans health care and chose
Tim for his stand on Constitutional principles of government and liberty to
provide health insurance. Click below for a link to the organizations
website and endorsement.
http://www.myminnesotahealthcare.com/
Timothy Utz
Endorsed Candidate for Minnesota House 50-A in 2010
BPOU Delegate
CD-5 Delegate
Republican Party State Delegate
Republican State Central Delegate
Campaign Committee for Constitutional Republicans
www.timutzforhouse.com
This communication is considered private and not transmittable or
reproduced without written authorization from the candidate.
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Powered by ScribeFire.
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Understanding Obamacare.
Another great great submission from the Gman, neither one of us said this. I believe it is a posting from "Marilyn" Apologies to whoever wrote it, It is good so I am posting it.
"Let me get this straight. We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don't, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it but exempts themselves from it, already signed by a president who also smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's broke.
What the hell could possibly go wrong?"
district50ablog.blogspot.com
Powered by ScribeFire.